You can will your money to whomever you wish . . . as long as you don't leave out gay people.

Have you noticed that gays no longer use the "we just want tolerance" thing? How long has it been since you've heard one of them say that? Now they demand to have whatever it is they want.

I always thought that it was an individual's prerogative to leave his estate to whomever he wished. "Not so," say gay judges. Robert Mandelbaum is a criminal court judge in Manhattan. He and his "spouse," another man he "married," have a 2-year-old son by a surrogate mother. Mandelbaum's late father was a wealthy man, but Mandelbaum doesn't like his father's will. 

According to the stipulations of the will, unless Mandelbaum is married to the mother of his child, the child inherits nothing. Mandelbaum is contesting the will on the grounds that his father is trying to force him into a sham marriage. I don't often use texting abbreviations; however, this one calls for a very large LOL! A marriage to a man is not a sham, but a marriage to a woman is? At any rate, his father is not "forcing" him into anything -- if he doesn't want to marry the child's mother, he certainly doesn't have to. He just has to decide whether he's that mercenary or not.

If that argument doesn't stick, Mandelbaum has another -- his partner could be considered the child's "mother." 

Countering Mandelbaum's so-called grounds, Joshua Rubenstein, a Manhattan estate lawyer, said, " . . . it's your property, and you can do whatever you want with it." At least you could up until the homos started asking for tolerance.

On another note, I wonder just what kind of idiot the surrogate mother is. What kind of woman has a child and gives it to a couple of perverts?

"Will cuts out boy unless gay dad marries his mom." The Dallas Morning News; August 25, 2012, p. 8A.