Thursday, August 14, 2008

The question is not what can WE do . . .

Dallas Morning News columnist James Ragland is upset. The Brookings Institute released a study Tuesday that says in the first half of this decade, the number of low-wage workers and families living in poverty-stricken neighborhoods rose by a striking 41 percent. A high poverty neighborhood is one in which at least 40 percent of the population qualifies for the federal earned income tax credit. For a married couple with two kids, the poverty threshold was $19,806 in 2005, and the earned income tax credit income limit was $37,263.

Alan Berube, a Brookings fellow and co-author of the study, says, "For those who thought we may have solved the problem of concentrated poverty, the message is, we haven't done that." Ragland says, "That observation hardly surprises those on the front lines of our nation's ill-fated war against poverty." Berube further states, "Robust economic growth, together with smart policies that help reduce economic segregation, remain critical for helping low-income people and places."

Larry James is president and CEO of Central Dallas Ministries. He says "We've got to rise above the partisan political battles and come to grips with quality-of-life issues that affect us all."

Did you notice anything missing in these ideas for solutions? I did. Not one mention of what the poor could do to help themselves -- we've got to wage the war on poverty, we haven't solved the problem of poverty, smart policies are critical. Maybe the Brookings Institute is just a little too politically correct to tackle the problem head-on, but I'm not.

Here's how we can stop poverty in its tracks:
1) Don't have babies out of wedlock.
2) Don't drink.
3) Don't do drugs.
4) Don't smoke.
5) Don't have babies when you're a teenager.
6) Finish school.
7) Don't depend on welfare -- have some self-respect and get a job. Leave welfare for those who really need it -- the elderly, and the mentally and physically disabled.
8) After you marry, don't have more babies than you can afford.
9) When you can afford a house or apartment, take care of it. Don't knock out the windows in drunken brawls and tear up the plumbing then leave the mess owing 3 months rent.
10) Don't gamble.
11) Don't buy luxury items you can't afford (big screen tvs, hi-tech cell phones, big cars, computers, ipods).

See -- that didn't take even one government policy! All that's required is some old-fashioned common sense which no one in Washington seems to have these days.

Just a footnote to all this -- did you know that 95% of the kids in Dallas public schools are on free or reduced lunch programs? What is wrong with this picture?!!!!!

"A poor showing for a rich nation." The Dallas Morning News; August 13, 2008; p. 1B.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Essie May...I'm writing in your name for President!!!!

Anonymous said...

I will definitely vote for you!

Anonymous said...

Trouble is, I know lots of people who have abidded by your "blame the victim" advice. They are still poor thanks to wage structure issues and other policy matters. Of course, folks like you help keep the poor trapped, except for the rare exception. BTW--lots of rich people violate most of your "commandments" but are protected by the power of their wealth. Hope you're always wealthy and in need of no grace. Sing loud in your church Sunday, I'm sure it'll make you feel really good.

Essie May said...

Essie May is so glad that Anonymous of August 16 knows so much about her level of wealth and spiritual condition! I wish I knew Anonymous. I'd ask her/him to find me 10 people in housing projects who don't fit into at least one of the categories I listed. I think it would probably be kind of like Lot in Sodom -- it'd be awfully hard to do it.

I must say, I never realized that I was the reason poor people were poor. Thanks for opening my eyes, Anonymous.

By the way, there is no such word as "abidded," and most of the rich people who don't abide by my advice aren't asking me to support them, so I really don't care what they do.